Mount Gerizim Temple Worship - Part 2

Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore

December 3, 2017

Scripture Reading:  John 4:22:  “Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.”

The last week of November saw Prince Harry of England announce his engagement to the biracial American actress, Meghan Markle. The 35-year-old actress has a white father and a black mother who were divorced when she was just 6-years-old. That would make Meghan a mongrel, but as the world says, she is biracial. Meghan herself is once divorced. Does anyone feel like they would like to tear their clothes and pull the hair off their head and beard?

But Meghan’s background is more than a white/black mixture. Her ancestry is an unusual combination of a Black/White/Protestant/Roman Catholic/Jewish blend with ancient beliefs of the Edomite/Samaritan religious systems. She was married to Jewish producer Trevor Engleson from 2011 to 2013. The pair had a Jewish wedding in Jamaica, complete with a “Jewish chair dance.”

Meghan Markle spent Christmas in Toronto with her mother Doria Radlan.  The future nobility of England spent “Christmas” in Toronto? Why would any person whose ancestry was void of spending the most revered holiday in the so-called Christian faith, now spend her days buying gifts for Christmas? That is another of the endless proofs that Christmas is not a holiday of true Christianity. It is the Mass of Christ, a Roman Catholic tradition. Any true Christian would hate and not celebrate it, just like the early Protestant Puritans did in early America. She has a mixed-up, confused combination of various religious viewpoints.

Prince Harry is himself, through his father and his mother, part of the wicked-seed line.  Princess Di was part Jewish and Prince Charles is part Jewish, part Arab, and descends from Ghengis Khan and Count Dracula.

Meghan’s mother, Doria Radlan, has a master’s degree in social work from the University of Southern California and works as a psychotherapist and yoga instructor.  Her father, of Dutch, English, Irish and Scottish descent, is Emmy-award-winning lighting director whose profession resulted in his young daughter often visiting the set of Married … with Children. Do you think that was a good environment for a child to grow up in—on the very sexually, oriented set of Married with Children?

Considering the past, numerous Marxist politics of the “Royal” family, this should come as no big surprise.  The Jewish media worldwide will have a field day worshiping this forbidden union rubbing it in the faces of all the white folk in the world.

The future royal bride, Markle is:

• Not White; she is bi-racial
• Not British; she is an American who will be a dual citizen
• Not Nobility; she is an American actress
• Not a Christian; she grew up Protestant. Her mother is Protestant and her father Episcopalian. She went to Roman Catholic schools. She was married to a Jew for two years. She had a Jewish wedding. She is to be baptized into the Church of England before her marriage. Markle has been a Protestant, a Roman Catholic and a Jew—a good combination for a one-world-religion.
• Not a Virgin; she was married for two years, and if she acted like most young people, she wasn’t a virgin when she was married the first time
• Divorced; she was married only for two years to a Jewish producer in a Jewish wedding

She is the opposite of everything it means to be British Royalty. This is the endgame of Liberalism: the destruction of Western identity, institutions, and people. The destruction of God’s pure and holy-seed people. Marry any one of any race of any religion of any culture—that is what political correction (evilness) says today.

Mrs. Markle Engleson and her husband are lifted in the air in a Jewish ceremony at their wedding in Jamaica.

The British Royal couple.

But this wedding is only one in a numerous, world-wide epidemic of interracial marriages that has taken place all over the globe. Here are a few more:

Randy & Erika Jackson:  The American Idol judge, Randy Jackson, married interracially but was divorced after 18 years.

Vanessa & Kobe Bryant  Kobe Bryant has been married to Vanessa since 2001 and although it has been a bumpy ride, they are still together. Believe it or not it started on the wrong foot when Bryant’s parents did not approve of the interracial marriage, and they went as far as to not attend the wedding. Nevertheless, they got hitched and Bryant took her along for his ride to the top of the world of the NBA.

Eddie Murphy & Paige Butcher  Eddie Murphy is happy to have landed his Australian girl. They were first connected in 2012 and have not slowed down. They already had their first baby together and rumors are swirling that they are expecting another.

Mitch McConnell and his Asian wife, Elaine, have been married since 1993.

There are thousands of photographs that I could show, but you get the idea that inter-racial marriages are now politically correct. Very few people know that Koby Bryant’s parents disagreed with their son’s marriage with a woman of another race and didn’t even go to the wedding. But there is a very small remnant in almost every race that believe the same way.

Few remember that when Muhammad Ali, the former Cassius Clay was, in his prime, the uninhibited “king of the world,” he was no expounder of brotherhood and racial broad-mindedness. On the contrary, he was an unabashed bigot and racial separatist and wasn’t shy about saying so. Ali was very outspoken person about the evilness of interracial marriages. I remember him talking about the blue birds and the robins; he said they don’t even mate. Ali was against anyone marrying outside of their race. He repeatedly emphasized the notion that he wanted his children to look somewhat like him. He didn’t want, nor did he agree, that individuals would want children that were not created in their image.

But now we are having an epidemic, i.e. just an explosion of interracial marriages. It once was unlawful for any of these marriages to occur (until 1967 in America), but now it is politically correct, and they are happening with the approval of the state. There is hardly any voice of opposition being raised. What happened?

If there are 400 prophets of Baal who say that interracial marriages are okay and one priest of the God of Israel who says that it is one of the worst sins a pure-blooded Israelite can commit—who would you believe? Let’s begin by explaining the pronouns and the word “Jews” that are used in this our introductory verse of scripture:

John 4:22: “Ye [pure-blooded Judahites worshipping with the mongrel Samaritans at the ruins of the temple at Mt. Gerizim] worship ye know not what: we [pure-blooded Judahites] know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews [pure-blooded Judahites.]”

When Jesus came to this earth, and began His ministry, who did He preach to?

• Did He go to the Indians who were living in Central and South America? No, there is no record of Jesus the Christ ever being anywhere near the continent of South America.
• Did He go to the savages who were living in Africa? No, there is no record of Jesus the Christ traveling to Africa, except to Egypt as a young boy.
• Did He go to the billions of heathens living in Asia? No, there is no record of Jesus the Christ traveling to Asia and the Pacific Islands.
• Did He go to the Indians who were living in Mexico and North America? There is not enough evidence outside of false Mormon theology of Jesus the Christ doing any traveling in Mexico and North America.

Now why did He not go to all these different races, cultures and diverse individuals? Could Jesus have traveled all over the globe and spread His message to all the individuals in the world if He wanted to? He could have, but He didn’t, because He knew that His message was not for everyone in the world. And what was His message? Did His message apply equally to the individuals who hated Him and the people that followed Him?

• Did He go to the divorced ten tribes of Israel in Europe? Yes, there are records of Jesus the Christ traveling with His uncle, Joseph of Arimathea to England when He was a young man. A very small branch of the Episcopal Church in America, who formally broke off from the main denominational branch after many false doctrines, still teach that Jesus Christ traveled with His uncle to Glastonbury, England on several occasions.
• Did He go to the Middle-East? Yes, He lived in the middle of the earth, in the middle east. The evil-seed Canaanites/Edomites wanted Him dead; the other races and mongrels didn’t believe His words, only His sheep had the ability to “hear the Words of His father.”

So, the Biblical record of Jesus shows that He was born in Bethlehem, lived for a short time in Egypt, and then lived most of the rest of His life in Galilee. There are certain historical records that show that Jesus did travel to England with His uncle, possibly several times. There are also a few historical records that indicate that Jesus might have traveled to a few parts of India.

But does anyone consider where the 12 disciples went after the death and resurrection of their Savior? The Bible only tells about where a few of them went. For the remainder of the disciples the Bible remains silent about where they went and what they accomplished.

But there are historical records that tells us that none of them went to:

• Central and South America. The first missionaries to this continent didn’t come until around the year 1600, and they were missionaries from the Roman Catholic Jesuits.
• Africa.  Except for Ethiopia, and the Mediterranean coast line of northern Africa, including Egypt. Portuguese Catholics had a missionary center in central Africa between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, and there were few, if any, lasting results. Only at the end of the eighteenth century did the Evangelical Revival begin to bring to Africa an influx of missionaries whose labors would produce the first fruits of an enduring false Christian presence in Sub-Sahara Africa.
• Asia. Missionaries began around 1800 invading the largest continent in the world.
• North America. It was around the 15th century when Protestants began to come to North America, escaping Catholic persecutions.
• Europe. Yes. The first church building in all the world was in England. It also hosted the main missionary center that was for all of Europe, and very soon after another missionary center sprang up in France. Disciples were going all over Europe as the divorced Israelites for 700 years were quickly throwing off their false gods and believing in their Kinsman-Redeemer. Lazarus and his sister are buried in the basement of a church in Marseilles, France.
• Middle-East. Yes. That was where the church of the New Testament began. Jesus the Christ was crucified and resurrected in Jerusalem, lived most of His life in Galilee, and very seldom spent much time in Samaria. And He preached to only His sheep, for the others, evil-seeded Canaanites and the non-Israelite Samaritans couldn’t hear them either.

There was a church at Jerusalem, but it was soon gone shortly before the destruction of the entire city by the Romans in 70 A.D. There were churches around the area and in Turkey, Rome, Greece and other close-by areas as well as in Ethiopia, Britain, Wales, Scotland, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Finland, Belgium, Norway, Russia, etc.

So, the universalists (Catholics and their daughters) are wrong. There were no churches in South America, Central America, North America, Asia, central or southern Africa. Why didn’t Jesus or His disciples go to all the people of the world and proclaim the gospel of salvation that is now so commonly preached? Instead, both Jesus and His disciples went only to His people, the Israelites, and preached the “gospel of the kingdom [of Israel].”

That presents a terrible problem for those who believe in the world-wide theological game. They teach that most of the individuals of the world have gone to hell, as most of the world has never heard of Jesus Christ in their entire life. They never even heard the words “Jesus Christ”, let alone, what He did and what was done to Him.

This is just as true after the resurrection of Christ, as it was before His resurrection. But now we have guilty Christians, rushing to every part of the earth, fanatically proclaiming the gospel of salvation to every single person on the face of the earth to have them “saved.” After every creature has had the opportunity to agree or disagree with the death of the Savior, then the end shall come. But that is not the historical, true Christian doctrine at all.

But there are billions of individuals that have never heard of Jesus the Christ. And every twenty years another generation comes on the scene and believe that if they never heard of Him, as the Judeo-Christian thinks, they certainly never were, nor can they ever be, as they say, “saved.” So, billions of dollars are pumped into the “save the world” missionary fund, in a vain attempt to “save the world.” The Bible says that the whole world can “never be saved” and that the evil-seeded world is destined for “hell.”

John 4:19-21:

19) “The woman saith unto Him [Christ], Sir I perceive that thou art a prophet.

20) Our fathers [whose fathers?] worshiped in this mountain [what mountain?]; and ye say that in Jerusalem [where in the capital city?] is the place where men ought to worship.

21) Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem worship the Father.”

The woman at Jacob’s Well had a very interesting discussion with our Savior. What did she mean when she said, “Our fathers worshiped in this mountain”? and “and ye say that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.” What are the answers to these three questions that are posed in verse 20?

“Our fathers” ... What did the woman mean when she said these two words? Did she mean “everyone’s fathers”.  No.  Because in verse 12 of this same chapter she asked Jesus a question: “Art thou greater than OUR FATHER, Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank from it himself, and his sons and his cattle?”

The woman was speaking to Jesus at what is called, even today, “Jacob’s Well.” It was, as she explained, the well that her father (meaning an unknown grandfather) Jacob gave to his descendants. It was the well that Jacob and his sons and his cattle drank from. If Jacob was “her father” then she was an Israelite.

Notice Jacob’s Well which is near the tomb of Joseph.

• “What mountain?”: The mountain the people of Samaria worshipped at since 400 B.C. was Mt. Gerizim. It was in ruins for over 100 years when this discussion was held between the woman at Jacob’s Well and Jesus the Christ.
• “Where in the capital city?”: Where did the people of the kingdom of Judah worship in Jerusalem. It was at the Temple of God. The woman at Jacob’s well was saying that her fathers for over four centuries worshipped at the House of God at Mt. Gerizim and that Jesus was saying that the correct place to worship God was in Jerusalem.

If anyone “hears the Words” that Jesus answered the Samaritan woman, no one would be a “Judeo-Christian.” The woman said to Him that the Samaritans say that it is in Mt. Gerizim that the people are commanded to worship the Father, and the Judahites say that it is in Jerusalem (where the temple of God was built) that the people are to worship the Father. Which one, Mt. Gerizim or Jerusalem, did Jesus say was the right answer?

Jesus didn’t identify which one was correct, but stated that it soon wouldn’t make any difference. For in both Mt. Gerizim and in Jerusalem, no one would be able to worship the Father. Think about what He said. Both in the ruins of the temple at Mt. Gerizim and in the soon-to-be ruined temple of God in Jerusalem, no one would in the future would be able to worship the Father in those two locations. What does that mean?

Samaria was in the region of the one-time northern kingdom of Israel. It became the capital city. The northern kingdom forbad any of its citizens from worshipping God in His temple in Jerusalem, because Jerusalem was in the land of the southern kingdom. Instead, they built two temples, one in Bethel, in the southern portion of the kingdom, and one temple in Dan, in the Northern part. Each temple had a golden calf and no person from the tribe of Levi was permitted to be a priest in these false temples.

1 Kings 12:28, 29:

28) “Whereupon the king took council, and made two calves of gold, and said unto them, It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem: behold thy gods, O Israel which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.

29) And he set the one in Dan and the other in Bethel.”

View of Solomon’s Temple

Later, king Ahab…

1 Kings 16:31b-33:

31b). “…Took to wife, Jezebel the daughter of Ethbaal king of the Zidonians, and went and served Baal, and worshipped him.

32) And he reared up an altar for Baal in the house of Baal, which he had built in Samaria.

33) And Ahab made a grove; and Ahab did more to provoke the LORD God of Israel to anger than all the kings of Israel that were before him.”

Samaria had an altar for Baal in the house of Baal. The house of a foreign god was in Samaria? The god of integration and race-mixing was now the god of the Kingdom of Israel.

In less than 70 years from Ahab’s death, the kingdom of Israel was no more a nation. Babylonians from five cities were now living in the region of Samaria. And they continued worshipping the gods that they had before they immigrated to the former Promised Land.

After the kingdom of Israel was taken in captivity by the Assyrians, the land was resettled by foreign Babylonians from five different cities. When the kingdom of Judah was also taken into captivity, they, after 70 years, were given the opportunity to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their city; both the temple and wall. Nehemiah and the governor of Samaria, Sanballat, got into a furious argument over Sanballat’s daughter and a priest in the temple of God in Jerusalem. They had interracially married, and Nehemiah had told Manasseh, the priest, to divorce his strange wife. Sanballat, in a successful effort to keep his wife married to Manasseh, told Manasseh that he would be the priest of a new temple that would be built on Mt. Gerizim. The temple was built on Mt. Gerizim around 400 B.C.

Today, Judeo-Christian Churches (practically all so-called Christendom) proclaims that the Canaanite/Edomite/Jews are “God’s chosen people”, and that the temple at Jerusalem will be rebuilt in the future. So, they are saying, in opposition to what Jesus said in John 4, that in Jerusalem will be once again the place where you can worship the Father. Either they are correct, and Jesus is a liar, or Jesus the Christ is correct, and they are liars.

The temple at Mount Gerizim was destroyed by John Hyrcanus, the high Priest of Israel, in 130 B.C. But the temple, even after it was in ruins, still provided a place for the Samaritans to worship. The Samaritans retained their peculiar religion. It preserved their nationality. It is still worshipped today, even though the temple has been destroyed for over 2000 years.

After he destroyed the temple at Mt. Gerizim, Hyrcanus conquered the land of Edom and put to them a question that was asked at future Inquisitions:

• Come and live in our Promised Land, but the Edomites must first convert to the Hebrew way of living, or
• Be killed

John Hyrcanus provided the means for the destruction of the pure-blooded people of the remnant of the kingdom of Judah. Most of the Idumeans (Edomites) attempted to follow the ways of the Israelites enough so as not to be killed, but it was and is an impossible task for them. It was impossible for them to achieve this goal. So, both the Samaritans and the Edomites were conquered by the remnant of the kingdom of Judah and history was changed for each one; both victor and of the victims.

Hyrcanus permitted the evil-seed enemies to come into their land via integration, and within one hundred years they were controlling the nation that they were invited into. The Edomites controlled the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the government. They set up their own laws, Talmudic laws, and enforced them.

There were only a very few pure-blooded Israelites in the remnant of the kingdom of Judah left, who were living in the former Promised Land. They were suffering, as:

• Their children were massacred
• They had to worship at a corrupt House of God
• They had to endure the many torturous activities of their enemy ruling over them—they were powerless to change anything

But then, they heard that their king was in Jerusalem. What joyous news. They went to see and honor Him. But their enemies countered that He was a fake. He was nothing more than a Samaritan and was demon possessed. How could you have more opposing doctrines than the ones that were for or against the Messiah of Israel?

Both the Edomites and the Samaritans were perpetual enemies of the Israelites. But as the years changed, the tactics changed too. Part of both these groups, were mongrels created by their intermarriage with pure-blooded Israelites. The Edomites now were given the opportunity to establish control of the remnant of the kingdom of Judah, as most of the rest of the Israelites were scattered throughout Europe, the Middle East, northern Africa, and a few other places in the earth.

They were the main enemy of the ancient Israelites and opposed the doctrines that Jesus the Christ taught. They hated Him and they hated His followers. But a million of the Jews were killed in the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. This limited their influence as they were reduced to such a small number. It would take many centuries for them to regain their numbers and strength.

But shortly after the death and resurrection of Jesus the Christ, an individual became a major challenger and deceiver to the doctrines of Jesus the Christ. What religious group was he affiliated with? The Edomites or the Samaritans or another group?

This man became a major challenger to the things that Jesus’ taught. All the mainline or “orthodox” Christian authorities for the first four centuries state that the major heresy that afflicted the whole world with error started with the activities of this one man. Who was this man?

This man was an individual who mixed scriptural themes with pagan ideas and theologies. His chief characteristic was his attempt to bring in a one-world-religion with himself and his companion, Helen, as the main objects of worship. What he did was to blend the various beliefs of the Canaanite/Jews, the Canaanite/Samaritans and even the pure-blooded Israelites into a syncretic belief that was designed to unite the world into a single universal religion.

The man’s name…was Simon the sorcerer. What city of Palestine did Simon “…use sorcery and bewitched the people giving out that himself was some great one”? Was it located in Galilee, Samaria or Judea?

Acts 8:4: “But there was a certain man, called Simon, who previously in the same city [as Peter was preaching, i.e. in Samaria] used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one.”

Simon’s companion, Helena, fit his plan exceptionally well. One feature of the myth of Helen can be traced to the very ancient connection of the religion of Osiris with Syria. According to legend, Isis spent 10 years at a brothel in Tyre during her wanderings in search of the scattered limbs of her husband. Osiris was clearly Nimrod and Isis was Semiramis. Thus, Simon Magus said that he had been the power that motivated Nimrod and that Helen was Semiramis -- the Queen of Heaven.

We have a Catholic Church located about two miles from our location where we meet each Sunday that is called, Mary, Queen of Heaven. Is there competition for this position or is it the same deity with different names. I think that the latter is correct. Semiramis and Mary are both called the Queen of Heaven! The Catholic Church must be a latter-day version of Simon Magus’ false church!

Now let us carefully note that Simon brought his “special woman” from the City of Tyre. And who else was from Tyre? It was the original Jezebel--the woman who seduced both Israel and Judah to worship Baal? She was the daughter of the king of the Sidonians whose capital city was Tyre. (I Kings 16:31). The original Jezebel was also from Tyre.

Her name was Helen and she claimed herself to be the creation of Simon–that it was Simon who brought her into existence (Encyclopedia Britannica, vol. 25, p. 126). She was, in a sense, the daughter of Simon. But, the original Jezebel was the literal daughter of the king of Tyre (1 Kings 16:31).

So, the early Christian church battled against the Edomite, which held to the pre-death of Jesus Christ way of doing things, and the Samaritan, which espoused a multicultural, multiracial and a universal “love everybody” view of the world. The Edomites over time became “Judaism” and the Samaritans eventually became “The Roman Catholic Church.” Meghan Markle is a combination of both. May God have mercy on our souls.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.