The Unholy Seed - Part 18
CINCINNATI'S REDEEMER HAS DIED
Compiled from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore
July 21, 2019
Scripture Reading: 1John 3:10: “In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.”
IN THE NEWS
The most recent horrible thing the Osteen family (Joel and his wife) have done is their recent appearance at an event celebrating a major LGBTQ+ “gay” pride event. A news site headlined "Joel Osteen Attends Lady Gaga LGBTQ+ Pride Event.” According to the New York Daily News, Gaga began by asking the crowd, “Are you ready to f***ing party tonight?” In the crowd were Joel and Victoria Osteen, who were indeed ready to party.
Prancing about scandalously dressed, Lady Gage (an Ashkenazi Jew) sang about homosexuality in her song Born This Way—“A different lover is not a sin, believe capital H-I-M,” the tune claims. “No matter gay, straight or bi, lesbian, transgendered life, I’m on the right track baby, I was born to survive. … I’m beautiful in my way, ’cause God makes no mistakes.”
Lady Gaga used bad language all through the performance. Using bad language is common nowadays, especially among the young people. They hurl f*** bombs so much that it has lost any effect on the hearer—except for disgust to a person who believes what the Bible says.
Another disgusting person, Megan Rapinoe, the United States women’s soccer star, ended her speech in Los Angeles after a parade in New York City in which she said, on live television, “New York City. You’re the motherf******* best.” There were little children both there and watching on television. Rapinoe, you remember, is an advocate for LGBQT+ as she is a lesbian and is very outspoken.
There is even a movement for her to run for President of the United States. In the locker room, after their final victory over the Neverlands, many of the team members made sexual gesturess, spoke inappropriately using many f*** words and a few made political remarks. Rapinoe, while holding the trophy, said “I deserve this.” After a parade up Broadway, Rapinoe said, “We have to love more and hate less.” Then why does she hate “President Trump and his policies?”
Then the goalie and one of the defenders on the world championship team announced that they are engaged and plan to get married in December in Miami, Florida, after a ten-year silent dating period. The two ladies made the decision to keep their relationship a secret from the public for the sake of the team and the franchise. “We wanted to be professional and make sure that we showed up every day and did our job.” The two, Ali Krieger and Ashlyn Harris wanted to come out and say this is who we are. Why did they make the decision to keep their lesbian relationship a secret from the public? The United States women soccer team is made up of many perverted individuals.
One player, Jaelene Hinkle, withdrew or was cut from the US Soccer team just two weeks after the organization announced that members of both the men’s and women’s teams would be donning rainbow-colored jerseys in honor of LGBTQ+ pride month (June). While it is not immediately clear if her departure is directly related to the National Women’s Soccer League’s decision to celebrate gay pride, Hinkle had not shied away from taking bold stances on the issue in the past. Hinkle said that the Bible is not a fictional book, you either believe it or you don’t. The coach of the team, Jill Ellis, a woman, is pro-LGBTQ+ and is a lesbian, who is married to another woman.
Ashlyn Harris, who will marry a fellow teammate, another woman, slammed fellow soccer player, Jaelene Hinkle on Twitter in response to an interview in which Hinkle claimed to step down from the team on the team’s decision to wear Pride jerseys.
“Hinkle, our team is about inclusion… The problem is your intolerance [Hindu influence] and you are homophobic. You don’t belong in a sport that aims to unite and bring people together. You would never fit into our pack or what this team stands for.”
It makes one wonder what does the US women’s soccer team stand for? It seems to me that it is part of the socialist state under a LGBTG+ agenda that is aimed at destroying the Christian values of the nation. The Bible clearly states its disapproval of all kind of sexual deviancies that PRIDE supports.
And what did Procter & Gamble, the multi-billion-dollar company headquartered in Cincinnati do? They gave $500,000 to the United States women’s soccer team and voiced their support, by paying for a full-page ad in the New York Times, for equal pay with the men.
May God have mercy on us.
The House of Representatives then met to make a statement on President Trump’s remarks on House Democrats. It was Tuesday afternoon. I turned the television on and was flipping through the channels, when I heard something on the U. S. House C-Span channel. The Representative, who only had a few minutes to talk, said that he did not disagree with the President on his remarks. He strongly said that he didn’t say any one’s race, or any one’s name, but they are “anti-American,” but everyone knew who he was talking about.
Then Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House gave her short talk. It was very interesting. She said that she attended a Spanish Catholic Mass on Sunday and that the preacher gave his sermon on the “Good Samaritan”. She referred to it as the “gospel of the Good Samaritan” in which the preacher said that we are to do “good works to our neighbor.” Of course, the priest said that our neighbors are strangers and foreigners. She said that President Trump should have heard that sermon. For on that day, he was arresting and splitting up the homes of many illegals. She talked about how “God gave us this nation,” but implied that it was given to everyone.
Does Nancy love Trump as herself?
“America is a beautiful nation that God has given us,” Pelosi said in her short speech. Did she really believe that God give the land of the United States to the Costa Ricans? The Africans? The Asians?
Immediately after her talk, Representative Doug Collins asked the House to delete her remarks. Pelosi had said that the comments that president had made in his tweets was disgraceful, disgusting and racist. The house decided that the word “racist” should not be allowed in the speech. They voted. The “Nays”, won. Then Rep. Collins asked for an electronic vote. The “Nays” won again. It was voted along Party lines. The country is split almost 50/50.
Lindsey Graham got on television and backed President Trump’s tweets. He said that the four women (“the squad”) were anti-American and Communist. Lindsey didn’t say this, but I will: Communism is a Jewish idea. So, the country is arguing back and forth on this issue.
And then there was the headline in the Cincinnati Enquirer newspaper on July 11, 2019 which said that Cincinnati’s Redeemer had died. Cincinnati’s redeemer…did Cincinnati have one? Was their redeemer a he, she, or an it? I quickly scanned the article and I found that they were referring to Marian Spencer who had died on July 8th. She lived from 1920 till 2019—99 years.
She was born in Gallipolis, Ohio, home of the Bob Evans farm which later became a restaurant chain, and she was descended from a former slave named Henry Walker Alexander. Her parents were Harry Donal Alexander and Rosanna (Carter) Alexander. But she grew up in her grandfather’s home, a freed slave with her brothers and twin sister and her parents. There was very little information available about her family tree, except for the fact that she was a mongrel. She was a mixture of Scottish, Indian and Negro seed. I couldn’t find out what ethnic group the Scottish man was, whether he was Ashkenazi Jew or not, or about what tribe of Indian—but that “if she had one drop of black blood in her, then she would claim to be black.” So, she called herself “black.”
She was named “Cincinnati’s redeemer” by United States federal judge, Nathaniel Jones in the 1970s. I guess she is named the redeemer of Cincinnati because she:
- Led the battle to desegregate Coney Island’s swimming pools in the 1950s,
- Became the first woman of color elected to Cincinnati City Council in 1983,
- Leader of the local NAACP branch;
- Head of the NAACP’s Legislative Committee,
- Leader in desegregating Cincinnati’s schools. She supported busing and school integration,
- Served on the UC Board of Trustees from 1975 to 1980,
- As NAACP president in the early 1980s, she teamed with infamous civil rights preacher the Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth to clean up a polluted site in Lower Price Hill, Cincinnati,
- Served as an Executive in Cincinnati’s Planned Parenthood,
- Served as a Democratic delegate to the Democratic National Convention supporting Jesse Jackson for president.
So, she was pro-choice, an integrationist, a Communist, and was a leader of organizations that are pro-Civil Rights. What do you think would have happened if Jesse Jackson would have been president, as she supported? She was a leader in desegregating the pools and schools of Cincinnati. All the things that she did and supported are against our God’s laws.
Because of all of her activities, she was awarded some of the following awards:
- In March 2006. The city of Cincinnati named a portion of Downtown’s Walnut Street in her honor,
- On Wednesday of this past week, one day after her death, the city flags were flown at half-staff in her honor,
- University of Cincinnati, where she went to college, named it newest residence building after her,
- Won the Cincinnati Enquirer’s “Woman of the Year Award” in 1972,
- Won an award from Cincinnati’s Council of Christian and Jews,
- And many, many more.
Marian Spencer describes herself as a fighter. “All people should be equal,” she said. “There should be equality, above everything. Given equal opportunity, we all arrive at the same place.” The Spencer’s were represented by Cincinnati attorney Alphonse Gerhardstein, remember him, in several lawsuits that they had filed. “Birds of a feather, flock together.”
Remember, Marian Spencer was not a pure black African. She was a mongrel. She was a mixture of black, Indian, and Scottish seed. But she identified herself as being an African-American, although that was not totally true. She also was part Indian and European, as well as African. But she said, “If one drop of black blood is so precious, I was going to claim it.”
One day in 1952, her two sons were watching the local “Uncle Al Show” on television and saw a commercial for the park. “Everyone comes to Coney Island”.
“When my kids said they wanted to go, I waited until they weren’t around and called,” Spencer said, “I talked to the girl who answered. I said, “We’re Negroes, can we get in?” The girl replied, “I sorry, but you can’t.”
Well, she wasn’t a Negro. She was a mixed seed of black, white and red. But she and her children were still forbidden to go as this was the 1950s. Coney Island pool was for whites only.
Cincinnati’s mayor, John Cranley, said about Spencer, “Small in stature, but a giant in impact, Marian Spencer led by example to build a more integrated city, and we all trying to live up to her example.” He didn’t say we are not following the God of Israel, but we are following His enemy.
James A. Fields, the man who was convicted of driving his car into a woman and killing her at the Charlottesville rally was Jewish. His Jewish grandfather killed his grandmother and then killed himself. The other side of his family has been redacted. Was his mother Jewish? Thus, he claimed that this incident caused him mental anguish…at least, that was part of his defense. He could be nothing more than a Jewish terrorist pretending to be a White Nationalist.
This past week, we have had Marian Spencer’s death, Congress telling the President of the United States to stop telling strangers who are anti-American in congress to “go home”, Joel Osteen and wife attending a Lady Gaga LGBTQ+ rally, Megan Rapinoe and other team members cussing and acting arrogant on their recent World Cup victory and James Fields, who is Jewish, was convicted. Do you see a common thread in all these people? They are all mongrels .... or they are people who are following what the “heathen” believe>
Have you ever wondered about why the Jews were deported out of most cities, states and nations in Europe? Were they just unfairly discriminated against because they were different? They were charged with ritual murder, the murder of Anglo-Saxon children, sorcery, witchcraft, nomocracy, or maybe it was that they were without any righteousness! Maybe it could be said best that they lacked the love of the brethren!
Who is a child of the devil? The Dake Bible says this about who is a child of the devil. They are individuals who are:
- Walking in darkness,
- Saying one has no sin,
- Failing to please God and keep His commandments,
- Failing to walk as Christ,
- Hating anyone,
- Failing to overcome Satan,
- Loving the world and the things in it,
- Leaving Christian fellowship,
- Ignoring truth,
- Denying God and Jesus,
- Doing unrighteousness,
- Making no effort to purify self,
- Committing sin,
- Murdering,
- Shutting bowels of compassion,
- Lacking faith,
- Being destitute of the indwelling Holy Spirit,
- Being of the world and having fellowship with it,
- Having no personal acquaintance with God or knowledge of eternal life,
- Making no confession of Jesus,
- Being overcome by the world.
Do you think that these 21 reasons are good or bad? Was one of the trees in the Garden, a “good and evil” tree? Do you think that that implies a good and an evil seed line?
1John 3:12: “Not as Cain, who was of the wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.” “Cain was of Satan.” Dake’s commentary’s notes on 1 John 3:12.
Isaiah 57:4: “Against whom do ye sport yourselves? Against whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? Are ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood,…” If there is a seed of falsehood, there must also be a seed of truth.
Matthew 15:13: “But He answered and said, Every plant, which My heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.” What plants were not planted by the heavenly Father? Could it be the mongrels?
John 8:42: “Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but He sent Me.” Jesus told his enemies that “If God were your Father,” which implies that God was not their father.
John 8:44: “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth?? Because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it.” Then Jesus tells them who their father was—the devil.
John 8:38: “I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.” Here Jesus speaks of two different fathers—My Father and your father. One capital “F” and the other a lower-case “f”. One is not a father unless he has children.
Matthew 13:24-30:
24) “Another parable put He forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in His field:
25) But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way,
26) But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.
27) So the servants of the householder came and said unto Him, Sir, didst not Thou sow good seed in Thy field? From whence then hath it tares?
28) He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt Thou then that we go and gather them up?
29) But He said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
30) Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into My barn.”
One sowed good seed, wheat, while His enemy sowed the bad seed, tares. The farmers were instructed to let them both grow until the harvest and then it would be apparent who is a tare and who is the wheat. Are we living in this time where we can tell?
These are just a few of the many Scriptures that tell that there are two different seeds in the world; who have two different fathers;
- One is your father who is the devil, the other is our Father who is the God of the Bible;
- One is a murderer and a liar; the others are children of righteousness;
- One is compared to the tares, whose destiny is the fire; the others are compared to the wheat, whose destiny is the barn;
- One is called by implication the “wicked seed”, the other the “good seed;”
- One does not have the capacity to hear the Word of God; the other can hear the Word of God;
- One will work the lust of their father; the other will do the work of their Father;
- One is called the children of disobedience, the children of wrath, the children of transgression, the seed of falsehood, the other is called just the opposite, the seed of truth.
The two seed lines are just the opposite. Notice that it says that they have different fathers, it doesn’t say that they have different fathers and different mothers. If they have just different fathers, is it possible that they have different fathers, but the same mother? How could this be?
Could it be that Eve had both of these two different children in her womb? One child sired by the devil and the other, who was a twin, fathered by Adam, who was created by God? It would have been like what happened to Rebekah, when she was pregnant with Esau and Jacob. It was said that she had “two different nations” in her womb. Her twins were fathered by the same person, unlike Eve, but their destiny was the same because Esau interracially married into the line of Cain, Eve’s first-born son.
Have you ever wondered why the “Jews” trace their lineage through their mother and not their father? A “Jew” is a person who says their mother is Jewish, not their father. If their mother is Jewish, it doesn’t matter who their father is; all their children are Jewish.
That is history, not just a silly tradition. For Cain had a different father than Seth, but they both had the same mother—Eve. How would you distinguish them? You could say that Cain’s father was the devil, or you could say that he was a descendant of Eve. Which sounds better? The descendants of Cain say that their mother was Eve; while God Almighty says that their father was the devil!
The descendants of Esau, the Edomites, the Idumeans, the Canaanites, the Kenites, all the sons of Cain, whose father was the devil and whose mother was Eve. Thus, we have two different seedlines; with two different fathers—one the heavenly Father and the other the leader of the fallen angels—Lucifer. Who was the mother? The Scriptures doesn’t say that they had a different father and mother. It just says that they have a different father. It implies that they have the same mother. That mother was Eve.
God created Lucifer and Adam Eve. God was the creator of all three of these entities. Lucifer was one of the highest creations of all the angels. Adam was created as a mature man from the dust of the earth and His spirit was blown into Him. He created his wife, Eve from his (Adam’s) own body.
The opponents of Christ must have been descendants of Cain as well as of Abraham. They were Esau and other Israelites who had inter-racially married into the Kenite/Canaanite seed line. Levi was another Israelite tribe that had inter-racially married so many times that it had almost completely polluted the priesthood. And as the rate of miscegenation is starting to explode all over the globe, almost all people will eventually be just like the Jew is—a mongrel people. They will be just like Marian Spencer was—a mixture of Scottish, Indian and Black or some other mixture.
“In the early chapter of Genesis, it is described that Cain moved to a region away from the sons of Adam, and built cities and had children, who were known as Kenites. They are described in Genesis chapter 4 and mentioned again in Genesis chapter 15. In that later chapter, we see ten tribes living in the land of Canaan.
Genesis 15:19-21
19) “The (1) Kenites, and the (2) Kenizzites, and the (3) Kadmonites,
20) And the (4) Hittites, and the (5) Perizzites, and the (6) Rephaims,
21) And the (7) Amorites, and the (8) Canaanites, and the (9) Girgashites, and the (10) Jebusites.”
Of these, the Kenizzites, Kadmonites and Perizzites have no prior mention in Scripture, they are not in the genealogies of Noah, and it is unknown where they could have come from. Some of the others are significant branches of the Canaanites, but the Canaanites and Perizzites—who are not mentioned in Genesis chapter 10—are distinguished in chapter 13, so the Perizzites certainly seem to be of some unknown race or racial admixture. Later, as these accursed people are enumerated in Joshua, some of these names disappear and others appear, but the people are still the same, and in the Biblical narrative the Kenites and Rephaim are still present in the land at those much later times, being mentioned often, and in other contexts.
The Kenites are descendants of Cain, and the Rephaim are a portion of the giants. These Kenites and Rephaim had been intermingling with the seed of Canaan for as many as ten centuries before the Israelites’ conquest of Palestine, as long as five hundred years before the time of Abraham, when the land was divided in the days of Peleg.
Examples of the Rephaim are Og of Bashan, and Goliath and his brothers, so this is not a singular allusion, but must rather be accepted as a Biblically historical fact. Ostensibly, in early times they spread out into other places as well, since these same Rephaim giants are ubiquitous in the legends of Mesopotamia, and they described with origins very similar to the Nephilim of Genesis chapter 6, from whom the Rephaim had descended. So when Esau married into the race of the Canaanites, he was marrying the daughters of bastards from the line of Cain and the Rephaim, and that is how Christ had quite confidently told His opponents that their father was a ‘murderer from the beginning’, a label which can only be applied to Cain.” Quoted from the book, Malachi, by Bill Finck, pp. 40, 41.
Yahweh God does not accept bastards as His children, as He did not create bastards as they do not follow His law of “kind after kind.” They are, in some cases, a mixture of fallen angels with women. And in others, one race with another race. Then their offspring, no matter who they marry is still a mixed-breed. All their offspring is cursed. It can never be created with a “pure” seed again.
That is the very big error of Answers in Genesis. They teach the direct opposite. They teach that all races come from the same man and woman. They say that they believe that Adam and Eve were probably brown in their skin color. So, they believe that everyone on the earth are really mongrels, including Jesus the Christ.
What do Answers in Genesis say about Malachi 2:11: “Judah hath dealt treacherously, and an abomination is committed in Israel and in Jerusalem; for Judah hath profaned the holiness of the LORD which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god.”
Judah only had two wives in the Scriptures. One was Tamar, but she wasn’t the daughter of a strange god. Judah had sexual relations with her (Tamar) just one time and had two Israelite twin sons—Pharez and Zerah. The other was a Canaanite woman who was the daughter of a strange god. Judah had three sons with her. So, Judah committed the same sin as Esau. Two of the three mixed-breed sons died before they had any children, but the third, Shelah, married another Canaanite woman and had the mixed-multitude of children. The tribe of Judah was saved from destruction by Tamar who almost lost her life in saving Judah. Judah repented, Esau didn’t.
CONCLUSION
The flood of Noah, if it was as the Answers in Genesis organization says, universal, then how many two-legged beings remained? Were there eight (four males and four females)? And from these, all the people on the earth today come from one of the three sons of Noah: Japheth, Ham or Shem.
But this presents a major problem—there are different races on the earth and all eight were from the same family, i.e. they were all the same race. Some try to get around this dilemma by saying that the three sons all married a person from another race. But this would make everyone in the world a mongrel. This is not correct, for there are some pure races still alive in the world today. And there are more than three races. So, this argument is wrong.
Others put other races on the ark—making the number of occupants more than eight. Some even put the giants on the ark—but this would make the ark another United Nations. What was the reason for the flood in the first place?
The bottom line is that there were two separate, different, and opposing seed lines for 6000 years. They were started from two different fathers, the devil and Adam. One was not from God, as they broke His law of “kind after kind.” The other was of God, as they were of “kind after kind.”
They both have been on the earth and have had different gods, a different way of doing things, and a different destiny. The “evil” seed line is trying to act as if they are equal to all other peoples on the earth. They say there is no difference, except for the skin color. They say that democracy is one of the best forms of government—but they are wrong. They are making their final attempt of controlling God’s kingdom on the earth. They proclaim love, love and more love and less hate. But is it okay to hate some things, somebody—like the devil? Like the devil’s children?
Lord’s prayer given to the wheat to pray:
Our (wheat’s) Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us (wheat) this day our (wheat) daily bread, and forgive us (wheat) our (wheat) trespasses, as we (wheat) forgive those who trespass against us (wheat) and lead us (wheat) not into temptation, but deliver us (wheat) from (the) evil (one, the father of the tares). For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever and ever.
Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.
To be continued.