Four Hundred Year Argument - Part 4
Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore
March 7, 2021
Scripture Reading: Acts 26:6, 7
6) “And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God unto OUR fathers:
7) Unto which promise OUR twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come. For which hope’s sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Jews.
WILLIAMSTOWN, KY—Ken Ham is at it again! Following the success of the Ark Encounter, the Judeo-Christian folks at the Creation Museum have broken ground on their newest brainchild: The Tower of Babel. It will be built on land near the Ark.
--------------------------------------------------------
Who would call Raphael Warnock, one of the two new senators of Georgia, a valid Christian pastor? “America needs to repent for its worship of whiteness,” he preached from his pulpit. Warnock is a black pastor of a black church in Atlanta. It is the church where the former communist civil rights leader, Martin Luther King, Jr. (real name: Michael King) pastored. Warnock hates the military, the police, the nation and he is very, very, very pro-abortion. Is any true Christian, especially a pastor, pro-abortion? He also is a communist. And he is a so-called Christian pastor! Hogwash!
The second Georgia senator, Jon Ossoff, said the following: “I’m descended from Ashkenazi [Jewish] immigrants who fled pogroms in the early 20th century, and I grew up among relatives who were Holocaust survivors.” [Ossoff (has an Australian mother and a Lithuanian Jewish father, who came to the United States in the early 1900s) was born in Georgia in 1987. The second world war ended in 1945. Ossoff was born 42 years after the war was over. So, when Ossoff was growing up, it would be around the year 2000, (he would have been 13 years old), his relative holocaust survivors (on his father’s side) had to be at least 75 years or older. Do you think that he grew up among relatives who were Holocaust (death camp) survivors? Did all the survivors from the death camp, who survived, who he mentioned above, move to Atlanta from Lithuania? Or do you think he just said this for political advantage?]
“So, my Jewish upbringing instilled in me a conviction to fight [is he using this word to incite an insurrection?] for the marginalized and oppressed, and also to be vigilant where there’s the risk that authoritarianism may emerge.” Jon also started his career in politics by working as an intern for civil rights leader John Lewis (who was a sponsor and vice chairman of Communist Party USA from 1962-64). After graduating from college, he inherited a large sum of money from his grandfather. He decided to run for the senate seat in Georgia in 2016 and lost in a runoff election to the Republican. He tried again in 2021 and this time he supposedly won.
It has been over 100 years since the jewish head of a pencil factory, Leo Frank, was hung as a result of his murder of teenager Mary Phagan in Atlanta. The Frank lynching frightened and intimidated Southern Jews. At Atlanta’s chief Reform synagogue, the Temple, where both Franks were members, is also where Ossoff is a member. Rabbi David Marx is friends with the black senator/preacher, Warnock. The Rabbi preaches that the lynching of Leo Frank will not be forgotten or forgiven, just like the holocaust.
Ossoff said that he would support Roe verses Wade, expand Obamacare and enact criminal justice reform among other things. But he started receiving money from an anti-democracy media company in China. The money flowed through Ossoff’s company that supposedly made documentaries about government corruption. The Chinese media company that supported Ossoff is backed by the Chinese Communist Party. At first Ossoff refused to even disclose his financial ties to the Chinese Communist Party until he was continually asked about the issue that he later amended his financial filings.
Who would vote for these two individuals who are communists? Why would they win the runoff election? A black mongrel man who hates this country and a Jewish mongrel man whose financial dealings are with the Chinese Communists.
Any Israelite who voted for anyone of these two former candidates has broken God’s law once again. The law says not to elect any person who is not your brother. Raphael is not our brother. Neither is Jon Ossoff. If you let others, who are not your brothers in your nation, you will learn their ways. You will serve their gods.
We have Caucasians, Negroes, Chinese, Samoans; mongrels, Indians (from India), Hispanics and others in our Congress, along with 168 Roman Catholics; 6 Orthodox Catholics; 72 Baptists; 44 Methodists; 35 Episcopalians; 35 Presbyterians; 26 Lutherans; 7 Non-denominational Protestants; 4 Restorationists; 4 Congregationalists; 2 Pentecostals; 2 Adventists; 1 Reformed; 1 Holiness; 2 Christian Scientists; 1 Unitarian; 13 Mormons; 30 Jewish; 3 Muslims; 3 Hindus; 3 Buddhists; with 11 Democrats who refused to answer; out of 635 Congressmen. All Republicans are of the “Christian faith” except for two members who are of the perpetual enemy of Christianity -- Judaism. All the rest of non-“Christian” members are Democrats.
We have six Roman Catholics and three of the Jewish religion in our Supreme Court [in our original Protestant nation?] and we have a Roman Catholic at the head of the Executive Branch.
What should we expect when we disagree with what our God told us? When we agree to let other races to immigrate into our nation, do we think that they will convert to our way of thinking or that we will submit to theirs? Do we think that they have the same views on life that we do? Are all races equal under our laws?
If you think that this last statement is true, then what is your interpretation of the following verses taken from the Bible?
WHO IS ALLOWED TO EAT AN ANIMAL WHO DIES OF ITSELF?
Deuteronomy 14:21a:
21a) “You shall not eat of any thing that dieth of itself: thou shall give it unto the stranger[#1616 Strong’s] that is in thy gates, that he may eat it; thou mayest sell it unto an alien [#5237 Strong’s]: for thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God.”Israel was different than the “strangers” who lived in their territory or the “aliens” who lived in other nations that were nearby. Israelites were forbidden to eat any animal which died of itself. That is, any animal which died of natural causes; that suffered a natural death, i.e. was not killed for sport or food. Who were these other individuals who were given permission to eat these dead animals, unlike the Israelites?
“Stranger” [#1616] is used to identify people of the same Adamic race who were not of Israel, but who were living in their nation.
“Alien” [#5237] is used to identify people of another race who were living in their own country. It can be either a racial alien as in Deuteronomy 14:21 or an Israelite foreigner as in Ruth 2:10. The context provides the clue.
So, Deuteronomy 14:21a could be translated:
Deuteronomy 14:21a:
21a) “Any person of the kingdom of Israel may not eat any animal that dies of itself: they may give that dead animal to any one of their same race [Adamic] who are living among them or they may sell the dead animal to anyone who is of another race who is living in another country. Both these other two kinds of people or individuals may eat the dead animal, but the people of Israel may not, for they are a holy people unto the LORD God of Israel.”You could donate the animal to one group of people; you could sell the dead animal to another group of individuals. How do you know who a “stranger” was that the Israelite could donate it to and who an “alien” was that they could sell it to? How can you do this if everyone is equal? For example, would it be a sin if you sold the dead animal that died of itself to a “stranger” [#1616]instead of an “alien” [5237]? It would be necessary for the Israelites to know who the “strangers” [#1616] and “aliens” [#5237] were in order to enforce this law given in Deuteronomy 14:21a. They had to know the difference between these groups of people. If they were all equal, then the same rules would have applied to all of them. But they weren’t.
WHO IS TO BE THE RULER IN THE ISRAEL NATIONS?
Let’s look at another commandment of our LORD God. How about Deuteronomy 17:15b? It is harder to interpret this passage of Scripture because the word “stranger” in this verse is the translated from the same Hebrew word [#5237] that is said to be “alien” in Deuteronomy 14:21.
Deuteronomy 17:15b:
15b) “…thou mayest not set a stranger[#5237] over thee, which is not thy brother [#251].”
Who is not thy brother? “Stranger” [#5237] is used to identify individuals of another race. The word “stranger” in English is translated from several different Hebrew words, which have different meanings. There are “strangers” of the same race and “strangers” of another race, for example.
So, Deuteronomy 17:15b, could be translated as follows:
Deuteronomy 17:15b:
15b) “…thou mayest not set an alien[#5237] over thee, which is not thy brother.” The word “alien” in Deuteronomy 14:21 and the word “stranger” in Deuteronomy 17:15 are translated from the same Hebrew word “nokriy” [#5237]. It is translated, besides “stranger” and “alien”, also as “foreigner” and “outlandish.” It also has the meaning of “adulterous” if an Israelite has a sexual affair with one of these individuals. So, if you come upon the word “stranger” anywhere in the Bible, you must check with what Hebrew or Greek word it was translated from [#241, 245, 1616, 2114, 2941, 3581, 3939, 4033, 5235, 5236, 5237, 8453] or you can get the wrong meaning of the word in English. It is very easy to make this mistake. But you just have to use a Bible concordance.Is Barack Hussein Obama the same race that we are? Obama is a mongrel of a Jewish mother and a black father. He is a different race.
Is Kamala Harris the same race that we are? Harris is the mongrel of an Indian mother [from India] and a black father. She is a different race.
Since they are different races, they are known as “aliens” or “strangers” [#5237] which God says that they are disqualified from being a ruler over us. There were preachers who said that “Obama was not my president” and this is the reason why they made that statement. There are some who say that “Harris is not my Vice-president.” Are they right or wrong? It is sad to say that most all denominational Christians are unaware that the Hebrew or Greek terms have meanings which are far more specific than the English words which are typically employed to represent them.
The “strangers” [#5237] were not to rule over the Israelites. Israel was to have a ruler who was descended from King David of the tribe of Judah. They were not to have any ruler from any of the other tribes and only a ruler from the family of King David. Now we have individuals who are of another race ruling over us and we are told that this is our strength! Why did the LORD God of Israel want His chosen covenant people to live by themselves? Because He knew if they allowed “aliens” to live among them, they would follow the laws of their gods, not the Laws of God.
WHO IS ISRAEL PERMITTED TO LEND USURY TO?
Deuteronomy 23:20:
20) “Unto a stranger[#5237] thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother[#251] thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it.”
In this verse there are two different people who are mentioned; one to whom you can lend usury to and one whom you can’t. The word “stranger” translated in this verse, is the same word as “alien” translated in Deuteronomy 14:21. Which one is a better translation? –- “stranger” or “alien”? In English, the better translation is “alien.” Israelites can lend usury to “aliens,” but not to themselves. God’s required punishment for breaking this commandment is death.
What do Christians, who are saddled with all kinds of usury debt, say about the following article?
“NEW YORK (JTA) — If you’re an Orthodox Jew with a mortgage from Quicken Loans, you might be in trouble. Agudath Israel of America, a major haredi Orthodox organization, issued a Jewish legal ruling last month prohibiting Jews from taking out loans from the Detroit-based company because it is majority-owned by Jews. Quicken Loans, which claims to be America’s largest mortgage lender, also owns Rocket Mortgage, the online mortgage agency.
Jewish law, known as halacha, forbids Jews from charging interest to other Jews. So, Jews are allowed to own mortgage agencies — and lend to non-Jewish customers — but they are not allowed to sell fellow Jews a 30-year fixed rate (or anything else). Likewise, if you’re a new Jewish homeowner, halacha says you are not allowed to take out a mortgage with a Jewish-owned company. The same also goes for other kinds of loans.”
This misapplication of the law of God is how the Jews got into the lending business in the first place. They (jews) could lend with usury or interest to us (Caucasians), but we could not lend money with interest to ourselves. The King needed money to fight his wars, so he got the loans (with usury) from the jews and set them up in the usury banks in his nation.
The Bible also says that anyone who borrows with interest is a slave. We are slaves to the Jews if we have a usury loan with them. If you don’t want to be a slave, don’t have any usury loans. Don’t have any loans that demand interest. If you are debt free, then you can rightfully cry, with radio-host Dave Ramsey, “Freedom!”
Does the above give a clue to the War Between the States? Did the war free the black population from slavery or did it just increase the number of slaves [black, white and oriental] to the owners of usury banks?
Whether the person obeys this law or not is dependent on being blessed by Almighty God. So, it is important to know who an “alien” or “stranger” is and who is a “brother.” The Christian world has been lied to and think that there is no distinction between these races. And thus, they sin.
Does anyone recognize this man? Does anyone know who he is? I didn’t either. He is a pastor in the state of Florida. He made a YouTube tape in November, last year (2020). It was very quickly banned.
Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt tweeted on November 27, 2020:
“#Anti-Semitic platform TruNews is now perpetuating an #anti-Semitic conspiracy claiming Jews are ‘orchestrating’ impeachment. There should be no place for this kind of hate on any platform. @YouTube should take down this content and their channel ASAP.”
StandWithUs CEO and Co-Founder Roz Rothstein similarly tweeted:
“This creepy man is a danger to civil society. His name is Rick Wiles, and he should not be allowed to broadcast hate like this. Wow. Get him OFF every possible platform!”
WHAT DID RICK WILES SAY ON YOUTUBE?
“Popular conservative Christian TV Host Rick Wiles warns his followers that the effort to impeach (the first impeachment) President Donald Trump is a ‘Jew coup.’” In a wild anti-jewish [this is the correct word, instead of Anti-Semitic] rant, Wiles claimed that “Jews are deceivers” who will “do whatever they have to do to accomplish their political agenda,” while arguing that the effort to impeach Trump constitutes a “Jew coup.”
I quote from the anti-Wiles website:
“Wiles does not need an excuse to be the Nazi that he is. He has been saying things like this for years. It just happens to be that ‘Jews’ are in fact running this [first] impeachment, such as Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Chuck Schumer and others. Schiff’s Counsel Daniel Goldman is Jewish. Nadlers Counsel Barry Berke is Jewish. Of course, we also have the traitor, Eric Swalwell, and Wolf Blitzer and Jake Tapper of CNN who are all Jewish. Throw in George Soros for good measure.
Who is worse? Is it the self-hating Jews (like Schiff, Nadler and Schumer) that are endangering the lives of Jews in America? Or Rick Wiles?
Someone should remind this neo-Nazi that Orthodox Jews just donated millions to Trump’s reelection campaign in an event attended by hundreds of Yarmulke-wearing Jews.”
On his “True News” program Wiles said:
“That’s the way the Jews work, they are deceivers, they plot, they lie, they do whatever they have to do to accomplish their political agenda. This [first] ‘impeach Trump’ effort is a Jew coup and the American people better wake up to it really fast because this thing is moving now toward a vote in the House and then a trial in the Senate. We could have a trial before Christmas….
This is a coup led by Jews to overthrow the constitutionally elected president of the United States and it’s beyond removing Donald Trump; it’s removing you and me. That’s what’s at the heart of it. You have been taken over by a Jewish cabal.
The church of Jesus Christ, you’re next. Get it through your head! They’re coming for you. There will be a purge. That’s the next thing that happens when Jews take over a country, they kill millions.”
Rick Wiles was only partially correct. He is missing part of the story. He was criticized that both sides of the American’s political story (i.e. Republicans and Democrats) are surrounded by Jews). The argument is made that how could the impeachment be a “Jewish coup,” when both sides are controlled by Jews! Rick gives the answer. It is the way that Jews act. They are deceivers. What better way to deceive the American populace that to have one party verses the other? But he is unaware that the jews (Kenite, Canaanite, Edomite, Ashkenazi, etc.) are natural enemies of God and His covenant people.
I since was sent an email [on February 21, 2021] from a friend [L. S.] which contain information on the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, and the former Vice-President of the United States, Mike Pence. It explained that a lawsuit in federal court in front of a federal judge was filed by lawyer Lin Wood, the lawyer who had represented the Covington Catholic student who had won hundreds of millions of dollars from the media channels: CNN and several big-time newspapers. The man who was putting on this show was Rick Wiles. He had three other men with him, and they discussed the case.
I will just briefly tell you that they explained that Jeffrey Epstein was involved with John Roberts and he even supplied him and his wife with two illegally adopted children from Wales. They also talked about the death of fellow Supreme Court Justice Scalia who had no autopsy and his body was cremated within several hours after his death. Mr. Wood said in a tweet that,
“I believe Chief Justice John Roberts & an multitude of powerful individuals worldwide are being blackmailed in a horrendous scheme involving rape & murder of children captured on videotape.”
Lin Wood also said, in his lawsuit, that Mike Pence was a traitor. He said that Mr. Pence was:
- Involved in pedophilia,
- Was sympathetic to communism, and
- Was a traitor to the United States.
Lin Wood said that they are being blackmailed by videos that had a gun, a child and a camera. I’ll let the rest be conjured up in your mind. The point, for this sermon, is that Rick Wiles discussed this on his show. I was very impressed, although Rick Wiles let some of his baggage of Judeo-Christianity slip.
MY BRIEF CHRISTIAN HISTORY
I was first an Arminian; then I became a Calvinist right after I graduated from college; now I am neither. I am a Christian Identity person.
An important question: Do the Arminians and Calvinists believe that I am “lost” or “saved?” I believe that Jesus the Christ came into this world as the sacrificial innocent lamb and shed His blood on Passover, was buried, three days later was resurrected and then, as High Priest, took His blood and sprinkled it on the heavenly mercy seat where it was accepted as the payment for the sins of the Adamic [White] race. Now, am I “lost” or “saved? in the eyes of mainstream Christianity?
So, what is a Christian Identity person anyway? We do not believe, like both theological views do, that the whole world is made up of “saved” and “lost” people. We believe, for example, the “gospel of the kingdom.”
What kingdom? If the Calvinists and the Arminians don’t believe in the kingdom; what about the Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, Independents and Socialists/Communists? That is the dividing line between Calvinists, Arminians and Christian Identity. It’s not the “gospel of personal salvation”, but the “gospel of the kingdom” that was preached by Jesus and his disciples. It is the tying cord to both testaments in the Bible. How can one:
Matthew 6:33: “…Seek…first the kingdom of God and all these things shall be added unto you”,
if they don’t know what the kingdom of God is? God was king of what nation in history:
- He wasn’t king of the Egyptians.
- He wasn’t king of the Edomites.
- He wasn’t king of the Canaanites.
- He wasn’t king of the Philistines.
- He wasn’t king of the Moabites.
- He wasn’t king of the Ammonites.
- He wasn’t king of the Assyrians.
- He wasn’t king of the Jebusites.
- Etc.
It was the covenant seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob – the nation of Israel, that He was king. He was the literal king over the nation of Israel. He sat on His throne on the mercy seat in the tabernacle of God.
He was rejected as their king and He gave only to them, the descendants of David of the tribe of Judah, to be their king. But this was an everlasting kingdom. That means that it still exists. It has never stopped being a kingdom. They were the people who the Apostle Paul was accused by the enemies of God of preaching to. The people who have the “hope of the promise made unto their fathers.”
WHAT IS CHRISTIAN IDENTITY?
On December 6th, 2020, I was looking through the Christogenea Hymn Book that was written by our own pastor, Jim Jester. He wrote about Christian Identity for people who may have discovered his Hymn Book without a knowledge of what Christian Identity is. Here is what he wrote that is in the Appendix of the Hymn Book:
“Christian Identity is not a new doctrine or belief system but has been around as long as Christians have been around. This Christian sect has not been very well known or popular in our day and age of many church movements and other religious organizations. Christian Identity adherents are from many backgrounds, mostly Protestant, but some Catholic or no religion at all.
THEOLOGY
Christian Identity is a Christ-centered theology based on covenant promises. Identity implies that we, as Christians, are racially aware. That is, we know who we are as the people of God. There is only one way to establish this identity and that is with the covenants found in the Bible.
While Identity Christians vary in their theological doctrines, beliefs, and conclusions, one premise sets them apart, i.e., they believe they are the Covenant People of God, the ancient Israelites, who God married by Covenant.
At this juncture, the Judeo-Christian adherent [Calvinistic and Arminian], and others, unfamiliar with the basic doctrines of the Christian faith, will assume Christian Identity is similar to Judaism and ask, ‘Is Christian Identity Jewish?’ They are unaware that the words ‘Jew’ and ‘Israelite’ represent two entirely different people. The terms are not synonymous.
The word ‘Jew’ did not come into being until circa 1750s A. D… That the Jews are not the covenant people of God can be easily proven by the genealogical records found in the Bible and by historic facts. This evidence has been largely hidden from the Christian people of the world.
Since the Jews are not the Covenant People of God, then someone else must be. Thus, Christian Identity doctrine asserts that the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred peoples are the descendants of the ancient twelve tribes of Israel. These people, also known as the White race, became known as Caucasians because of the Israelite emigration across the Caucasus Mountains from their captivity in Assyria. Jesus Christ called them ‘the lost sheep.’ Jews have never claimed to be lost.
Most Christians have never dreamt that they might be Israelites (not Jewish, not Israeli), the true descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob-Israel. Some Jewish scholars have even admitted that possibility.
‘Here’s a paradox…a most ingenious paradox, an anthropological fact, many Christians may have much more Hebrew-Israelite blood in their veins than most of their Jewish neighbors’ –Albert M. Lilienthal, Jr., What Price Israel, 1953, p. 223.
‘Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite” or a ‘Hebrew.’ – The Jewish Almanac, Richard Siegel and Carl Rheins, 1980, p. 3.
If physical Israel exists today, and the Bible clearly indicates she must, then she must be the masses of people who have accepted and promoted the Christian faith. History proves that the White race concentrated itself in Europe. They alone established and promoted Christian civilization. The Jews have always opposed the religion of Jesus Christ. The biblical record reveals that they despised Him (and still do) and plotted His death. The Talmud [the holy book of the Jews] reveals that He is in Hell today boiling in a pot of human excrement.
If you are a Christian, then why? Could it be that God, because of His Covenant, has elected you to salvation? ‘For Jacob my servant’s sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called them by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me.’ – Isaiah 45:4.
Christian Identity accepts the Christian doctrine of Election, which is based upon the everlasting Covenant made by God Himself while Abraham was asleep. It is clearly racial in scope. Later, God married Israel at Mt. Sinai as they agreed to the Covenant Law. This law did not apply to any other race. God has spoken:
‘He sheweth His word unto Jacob, His statutes and His judgments unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation: and as for his judgments, they have not known them. Praise ye the LORD.’ – Psalm 147:19-20.
Malachi 1:2-3 and Romans 9:13 (and other scriptures), as well as Jesus’ parable of the Wheat and the Tares, plainly reveals that there are some people left out of the Covenant. This is the purpose of the genealogies found in the Bible. ‘Jacob’ refers to all of Israel (both Houses), and ‘Esau’ refers to the Jews (Edomites, etc.).
Descendants of all these non-White groups still exist in the world today. The New Testament did not change the recipients of the Covenant and plainly says so. ‘…Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah.’ – Hebrews 8:8.
Notice, this verse did not say Christ died for all the people of the world with a new covenant. It is specific: both houses of Israel (or all 12 tribes of Israel). Other verses in the Bible that appear to contradict this conclusion are mistranslations or interpolations.
This ‘new covenant’ (still based on the Old Covenant) was accomplished through the death of Jesus Christ our Lord, the ‘Kinsman Redeemer’ of our race (Israel). If this sounds like a ‘racist’ (this word should be defined) version of the Bible, then Christian Identity gladly accepts the proper definition. Christian Identity believes the Bible should be interpreted within its context and in harmony with all other Scriptures. The error of many denominations is that they view the Bible as a universal book, which it clearly is not (Genesis 5:1).
Christian Identity believes in all the major doctrines of the Christian faith as set forth by the first century apostolic church before the gospels were corrupted, promoting universalism. Race is the most important teaching of all, for if we cannot trust God’s sovereignty in His Election and Covenant, then where does anyone stand?
‘For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto Himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth’ – Deuteronomy 7:6.
This passage is clearly a racial statement, and there are hundreds of such verses in the Bible.
God married only one bride, i.e., Israel. God identifies Himself all through the Bible as the ‘God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.’ Not once has God claimed to be the God of a different genealogical name or the God of everyone on planet earth. These two facts alone prove the Bible as a racial book. Clearly, the Bible is not a universal book for all peoples. It is the history of a particular people, i.e., Israel (the White race). Only they have born the fruit of Christian civilization down through history. ‘You only have I known of all the families of the earth…’ (Amos 3:2). Christian Identity stands with the Bible. Neither do we care if [we are] called nasty names.
CHURCH HISTORY
The Roman Catholic (universal) Church boasts that it can trace its origin back to the apostles and that Protestantism cannot, implying that it is the only true church. However, Christian Identity can also trace its origin to the apostolic age through the British church in Rome just blocks away from the present Vatican.
Joseph of Arimathea established the first above ground church in Glastonbury, England, immediately after the death of Christ (35-38 A.D.). Druidism had been an apart of the Isles for many centuries and merged with the Christian faith. The British church became known as the Culdees (Church of the Refugees) of the Celtic Church.
It is commonly believed that St. Paul was responsible for taking Christianity to Rome, but the church in Rome existed before Paul went to Rome. Evidence indicates it spread to Rome from Britain not from Palestine.
‘Christianity was first introduced into Britain by Joseph of Arimathea, A.D. 36-39, followed by Simon Zelotes, the apostle; then by Aistobulus, the first bishop of the Britons; then by St. Paul. Its first converts were members of the royal family of Siluria, that is, Gladys, the sister of Caradog, Gladys (Claudia) and Eurgen, his daughters, Linus his son, converted in Britain before they were carried into captivity to Rome. The two cradles of Christianity in Britain were Ynys Wydrin, ‘the Crystal Isle,’ translated by Saxons Glastonbury, in Somersetshire, where Joseph settled and taught; and Siluria, where the earliest churches and schools, next to Ynyus Wydrin, were founded by the Silurian dynasty’ – R. W. Morgan, Epistolae and Gregoniam Papam.
The fact that Joseph of Arimathea founded the first Christian church in England was also confirmed by the church councils of Pisa (1409), Constance (1417), Sienna (1424), and Basle (1434). The Britons have the historical claim to the first church building above ground, as well as being the first people to proclaim themselves a Christian nation — both almost two centuries before Rome! Thus, Roman Catholicism is not the only contender for authenticity.
Further mention of the British church and the travels of the Apostle Paul are found in the book of Acts chapter 29 (missing from our Bibles). It is also known as The Sonnini Manuscript, which was found in the archives at Constantinople.
POLITICS
Christian Identity is a practical faith. It is concerned with living a Godly life, not just personally, but on a larger scale. Sincere Christians are not just seeking the “sweet by and by” …for themselves, but a world of benefits for everyone via the kingdom of God on Earth. Our Lord said:
‘Seek ye first the kingdom of God and all these things shall be added unto you’ – Matthew 6:33.
Therefore, Christian Identity believers are Nationalists, i.e., they take the words of Jesus the Christ in His model prayer, ‘Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven’ seriously, and literally work toward it. A kingdom implies a king, a specific people, and land. A kingdom has laws and God’s kingdom is ruled by His Law. Therefore, most Christian Identity followers believe the ideal form of government is a Theocratic Monarchy…”
CONCLUSION
Of the three theologies in Christendom, Arminianism is the simplest. As I heard a very popular Arminian preacher, Joel Osteen, say on television,
“Just say this prayer with me: Jesus, I am a sinner. I repent of my sins. I put God in my heart and believe that you have died for my sins. Thank you for saving me.”
After saying this short prayer, Osteen then says that the person has been “born again.”
Calvinism was a step in the right direction. It believes that “Salvation is of the LORD” (Jonah 2:9b). It acknowledges that God is sovereign.
- But Calvinism identified the wrong people that God elected -- it is not every one of every race who can be a candidate — but it is the race of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and Jacob’s seed.
- They gave the wrong motive — it was not God’s secret will — but it is the covenant that Almighty God made with the race of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and Jacob’s seed.
Christian Identity adherents say that the reason that there are so many references to God being the “God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob” is because He made a covenant with that particular race of people and promised that He would be their God.
Luke 1:67-69:
67)“And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied, saying,
68) Blessed be the LORD God of Israel; for He hath visited and redeemed His people,
69) And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of His servant David.”
The father of John the Baptist, after being unable to speak during the pregnancy of his son, the first words that he spoke, being filled with the Holy Spirit, was that his son would be the announcer of the Son of God who would bring salvation to His people. “Blessed be the LORD God of Israel, for He has visited and redeemed His people.”
- How many did God choose to serve Him in the House of Israel as Elijah the prophet contemplated suicide? Answer: 7000.
- How many were willing to stand against the blasphemous yelling of Goliath the giant? Answer: One.
- How many left after Jesus the Christ told some of His parables to the crowd and never heard the meaning explained by Him? Answer: All but His disciples.
When do you think it was ever different? It has only been a few times when there were more than just a few people holding to the truths of the scriptures. We are privileged to be part of the remnant who know more than most of our Israelite brethren have for centuries. We don’t have all the answers, we just know enough to know that the only solution is our LORD and God. We need to know these truths, for we are the closest ones to the end.
Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.
