The Faith Once Delivered
by Rev. James Jester
December 1, 2024
SCRIPTURE READING: Jude 1:3-5
“Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. 4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. 5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.”
INTRODUCTION
The letter of Jude is essentially a sermon. In it, Jude preached against the dangerous practices and doctrines that put the gospel of Jesus Christ in peril. These were serious issues that Jude dealt with.
The picture presented by Jude of professing Christianity is not a picture that brings us joy, but it is reality. If that reality were withheld, we would miss the necessary warnings that should help us recognize the attacks made on God's truth. At the same time Jude encourages us. He points at the unfaltering faithfulness and omnipotence of God and the Lord Jesus for those who are willing to hold on to the truth which was once and for all handed down to them, and to defend it against the attacks.
“The common salvation.” Our salvation isn't common in the sense that it is cheap or that everyone has it. It is common in the sense that we are saved in common, in community, in society, in the covenant race. God doesn't have one way for the rich and another way for the poor, or one way for the good and another way for the bad. All of Israel’s race come to God in the same way. If it isn't a common salvation, it isn't God's salvation.
To be a Christian is to be a part of a community or society. To be a Christian means you stand shoulder to shoulder with millions of Christians who have gone on before. We stand with strong Christians and weak Christians, brave Christians and cowardly Christians, old Christians and young Christians. We are part of an invisible, mighty army that spans back through generations. The common salvation is not a theory, but an experience. Faith is the means; salvation is the end. "Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.” (I Pet. 1:9)
Just what was the “faith which was once delivered unto the saints?” Verse 5 gives us a clue: “…That the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.” Who are these people who came out of Egypt by the hand of God? They were called “the children of Israel” or "Hebrews.” The word “Jew(s)” does not appear in any of these early books of the Bible. Therefore, those known as “Jews” today have no relationship with the Holy Scriptures, even though some of their early forefathers helped translate them into Modern Hebrew. In doing so, they have taken much time and effort to take on a different identity other than their own.
The most noteworthy example of this is the fact that the jews have named their homeland incorrectly as “Israel” rather than “Judaea.” This was subterfuge, for the true people of God (descended from Jacob/Israel) do not live in that part of the world; rather, they were scattered in the Dispersions and migrated to the North and West of the world. This huge mass of Israelites became known as “Caucasians” (from Caucasus Mountains) and “Saxons” (sac’s sons, short for Isaac’s sons). These were the fulfillment of the prophecies found in Scripture: “Thou shalt be a father of many nations.” (Gen. 17:4) and “His seed shall become a multitude of nations.” (Gen. 48:19) The “Jews” of the world have never approached that number.
HISTORY
To answer the question, “What is the origin of Judeo-Christian doctrine?” I will be quoting from the book by Elliot Germain, Relevant World History, p. 692-697; under the heading:
Who Put the “Judeo” in Christianity?
Christianity was born in the days when Jesus walked through Galilee and Jerusalem, when Pilate was procurator of Judea. It was born in a hostile environment where the Pharisees rejected Jesus as the Messiah and voted to have him crucified by Pilate as recorded to have occurred in the year A.D. 33. In the year A.D. 37, a man named Josephus was born into a royal priestly family and became a Pharisee at age 19. The Pharisees of that time promoted a global dispersion (Diaspora) of their new international religion (Judaism) which required eliminating Jerusalem as the center of that religion. The Pharisee Josephus worked directly under the Roman General Vespasian for the total destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70.
Christianity was unstoppable, so certain Jews invented the Ebionite branch of Christianity that continued practicing Pharisaic Judaism. They referred to Jesus as the Messiah, not as God’s son, but simply as a human who fulfilled the law. Josephus joined this Jewish sect of Christianity, and with his high intellect, wrote the most profound history of the Jews. The early Church Fathers sought to learn more about Judaea so they studied the works of Josephus, the Pharisee. Can a former Pharisee be trusted? If a true Christian, yes. Apostle Paul was once a Pharisee, but take notice that the Ebionite sect (and Josephus) labeled Paul as an apostate.
Saint Augustine accepted the Judeo-Christianity practiced by Josephus, a Pharisee from the cult that killed Jesus. The works of St. Augustine and Josephus entered the Catholic priesthood and the seminaries of the Protestants. When Martin Luther (circa 1517) attempted to reform the Catholic Church, the Amsterdam Jews asked him to establish a Judeo-Christian denomination, Luther exposed those Jews as anti-Christian. They next tried to convert John Calvin, who accepted Judaism’s link to Christianity as “God’s Chosen People” and renounced the Catholic ban against usury. Amsterdam’s Chief Rabbi, Manasseh ben Israel, sanctioned Cromwell’s “Great Rebellion” that overthrew King Charles and eliminated England’s immigration ban on “God’s Chosen People.”
Calvinist Christians fleeing Catholic persecutions went to Amsterdam and collectively became known as the “Puritans.” In Amsterdam’s seventeenth century attempt to claim a portion of America, they sent their Puritan colonists to settle New Amsterdam (New York) and Judeo-Christianity came to America.
Prince Metternich was the Austrian Minister of Foreign Affairs negotiating at the 1815 Treaty of Vienna, and though he once referred to European nationalism as antisemitic, and had helped Salomon Rothschild in certain political and business deals, he did make this candid statement at the conclusion of that Treaty: “The House of Rothschild plays a much bigger role in France than any foreign government, with the possible exception of England. There are, of course, reason for it, which to me naturally appear neither good nor morally gratifying. Money is the great motive force in France, and corruption which is, in practice, the most important factor in our modern system of representative government.”
Metternich’s observation reveals that the existing Royal powers of Europe would be replaced by Rothschild-tainted democracies where “corruption… is… the most important factor in our modern system of representative government.” Consider that this truthful statement was made by a man who had a Jewish doctor, a Jewish financial advisor, and accused Europe and Russia of anti-semitism.
Just as the Russo-Japanese War of 1905 was a diversion for the Russian Revolution, World War One (1914-1918) was a diversion for the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. Churchill wrote an article titled “Zionism versus Bolshevism” in which he stated: “There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews… With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.” (Note: It has been determined that Lenin was one-forth Jewish, and notice that he said “atheistical Jews.”)
These words of Churchill do not stand alone; compare his account of the Russian Revolution to this Jewish admission as published in the American Hebrew: “The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, who’s goal is to create a new order in the world.” In that statement, they reveal that Bolshevism was a Jewish strategy with the ultimate goal of a new world order. There was also much braggadocio in the Jewish admission of their instigation of World War One as revealed in the statement by the Austrian Ambassador to England in 1918, Count Mensdorf: “Israel (the Jews) won World War One; we made it, thrived on it; profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity.” Mensdorf revealed the Jewish version of Judeo-Christianity is the destruction of Christianity.
The survival of Western Man is linked to the survival of Christianity but the International Jewish Cabal has targeted both for extinction. This agenda is not new, the popes knew this when they attempted to segregate Jews. This dual strategy against Western Man (racially) and Christianity has been observed by many people over the centuries. Consider the warning from the Russian Police Chief Chervil in his response to the Jewish Cabal-financed terrorism of 1880: “All Jewish capitalists have entered the universal Jewish cabal with goals hostile to the entire Christian population.” Should he be labeled antisemitic if what he said proved to be true? Is truth antisemitic?
Should historians of the Russian Revolution be labeled antisemitic when they refer to the Jewish-coordinated massacres against the Russian people as terrorism? When the Jewish media admit the gruesome facts of their own acts of hatred, do they call themselves antisemitic? A Zionist newspaper in New York, The Maccabean, published the article “A Jewish Revolution,” by M. Hermalin, which proudly admitted that terrorism was a Jewish strategy: “The Russian Revolution was made by Jews. We have created secret societies and planned the reign of terror. The revolution succeeded because of our convincing propaganda and our mass assassinations in order to form a government truly ours.” If these words were an accusation by a non-Jewish reporter, Hermalin would have surely been labeled antisemitic, but because it was a Jewish publication, he was not. Jewish terrorism finally created a government that was truly Jewish; communist Russia, a totalitarian dictatorship. Terrorism was simply a means to achieve ‘their’ utopia.
Whenever international intrigues and terrorism by the Jewish Cabal were discovered and exposed in Russia and Europe, the English and American media spoke only of antisemitism. The strategy for a world government requires the elimination of national borders, and the elimination of cultural distinctions such as as race and ethnicity. After communism was imposed on Russia, the Stalin regime invented the terms racist (1932) and racism (1936) to be derogatory labels in their psycho-political campaign against the cultural nationalism of Europe and Russia. Race and ethnicity are components of the many diverse cultures of the world, so their defamation became an essential strategy. One exception to Jewish cultural defamation is in their own ethnic segregation as the ‘ruling class.’
Do members of the Jewish Cabal consider themselves as equals among the whole of humanity and look forward to their union with humanity? Goldwin Smith (Jewish Professor of Modern History at Oxford, 1881) provided the answer: “We regard our race as superior to humanity, and look forward not to its ultimate union with others, but to its triumph over them.” Does the ideology of Karl Marx and communism align with Cabalistic Judaism? Karl Marx was a Jew, and as Rabbi Stephen Wise stated in 1935: “Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.” Communism is not the goal, it is a transition. Communism is not a threat to the International Jewish Cabal, it was their creation.
Put the pieces together: Rothschild financed the First International in London in 1864, this was where Karl Marx became the personification of communism. Was communism the Cabal’s endgame for a global humanity? Get a more accurate view of our prescribed future by combining these thoughts of Professor Smith with those of M. Hermalin, and those in the American Hebrew publication: “We regard our race as superior to humanity, and look forward not to its ultimate union with others, but to its triumph over them. The revolution succeeded… in order to form a government truly ours… the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new order in the world.” In 1915, the Russian publication of The Socialist Democrat, Vladimir Lenin proposed a “United States of the World.” Lenin may have only been one-fourth Jewish but he received his millions in funding from Rothschild operatives.
Did Jewish brains and Jewish planning really care about the poor and downtrodden of Europe and Russia? Was the Jewish Cabal sincere to their professed altruistic goal of equality? …Did the International Jewish Cabal’s victory in the Russian Revolution of 1917 bring equality and democratic power to the Russian working poor (the proletariat)? In 1918, after the Bolsheviks had full control of Russia and the power to appoint citizens from among the proletariats to positions in the new government, did they? Not according to London Times correspondent Robert Wilton: “Out of 556 functionaries of the Bolshevik State, there were 457 Jews.” A document of the Sixty-sixth U.S. Congress stated that out of the 388 members of the Petrograd government, 371 were Jews, and 265 of those were believed to be American Jews. Four hundred of the Jews taking government positions were trained at Rabbi Samuel’s synagogue in the lower East Side of New York City. The International Jewish Cabal had been planning to overthrow Russia for a hundred years, so naturally the Cabal felt that they, not the peasants, should be in control.
The Jewish Cabal, being a non-Christian self-separated occult organization, had for centuries practiced financial control over Europeans. However, they had trouble manipulating European Royalty because kings usually had their own wealth, such as the Russian Czars, and so to circumvent European Royalty, they promoted democracy because they could use their wealth to influence elections and politicians. This intended corruption of democracy is admitted in the famous Rothschild quote: “I care not who runs the politics of a nation, you let me run the money system and I’ll run the politics.” [End quote from Germain]
CONCLUSION
Donald J. Trump called the Democrat Party nominee for President, Kamala Harris, a “communist.” Isn’t this a correct assessment? The problem with America lies within the churches, for it is they who perpetuate the lies of the “Jews,” agreeing with their “Chosen People” claim, and turning a blind eye to the crimes they commit, both as a people and a state. These particular people have always worked toward communistic governments.
Both U.S. establishment parties are complicit in destroying our country, as their mentor, Karl Marx, have taught them. Democrats have led the charge into communism even on a world-wide scale. The U. S. has ruined the stability of the world with two world wars (essentially one war in two installments). The British and the jews played prominent roles in manipulating us into these wars using "false flag” events (and they still use this method today). The churches have failed America. They need to repent of their false gospel and the aid they have provided to our jewish enemy. It is well past the time to restore the Republic with Christian principles again; ending the present establishment. “Even so come, Lord Jesus.”
Can there be any doubt about the answer to the question, “Who put the ‘Judeo’ in Christianity?” From Josephus and the Ebionites, to Augustine, Calvin and then the Puritans who came to America. Was John Calvin a jew? If not, how did the jewish Cabal convince him? Calvin bought in to the “Chosen People” status of the jews, and now we are burdened with the Jewish Cabal and its international banking cartel. Judeo-Christian doctrine has replaced true Christianity; the jews have accomplished their goal. Martin Luther was certainly correct about the jews and he exposed them in his writings. If the Christian people had heeded Luther, it is likely that many religious wars would have been avoided. Surely, the rift between Calvinism and Arminianism would have been healed and church splits hindered. We would have a different world today with churches united by the true Christian faith “once delivered to the saints.”
Our text says there is only one “faith which has been given to the saints once and for ever.” (Jude 1:3, BBE) What we must defend is the faith that was once handed down. That faith has a covenant. Judeo-Christianity has no covenant. It is not about a newly discovered faith or a faith that is developing and new things are continually added. It has once and fully been revealed by God. There will be no more new revelations. We could state it this way: If it is new, it cannot be true and if it is true, it is not new.
It is not the “universal faith” spoken of by mainline churches, but rather the covenantal faith that was given to the covenant people of Europe/America by the God of our fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. God speaking to Abraham said,
“And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.”(Gen. 17:7)
The people called “Jews” today are not descended from Abraham, therefore the Covenant does not apply to them. They cannot possibly be the “Chosen People” of God. They are largely descended from Esau and other racial mixtures. They cannot believe in Jesus Christ; in fact they hate Him to the extreme. Their so-called “holy” book, the Talmud, promotes all kinds of evil in contradiction to the Christian Scriptures. Judeo-Christianity is an oxymoron. It is the enemy of true Christianity. It most certainly, is not “the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.”
End
NOTE: Ebionite branch of Christianity: Of the early centuries of the Common Era, from the Hellenized Hebrew term “ebion” meaning “poor” among the Judeans, or “poor ones.” They accepted Jesus Christ as Messiah, considered him human rather than divine, denied His pre-existence, that Jesus did not die for the atonement of mankind (only a martyr for the Law), rejected the Apostle Paul as illegitimate (called him “apostate from Judaism”), leaned toward Gnosticism, held to a vow of poverty, ritual washings and vegetarianism. The name “Ebionite” was first applied by Irenaeus in 180 CE when he referred to the sect as “heretical Judaizers” for “stubbornly clinging to the Law.”
